Is there anyone using this approach?

Any seblod field works only inside seblod, so this goes also for canonical field.

Ok, i understand that.

But the point is: if i have seblod router enabled (Global Configuration > SEBLOD > Site > SEF (Canonical URLs) - No), it will disable the Joomla router for all content, not only inside seblod.
After adding the canonical field, i can have the canonical tag back inside seblod just the way i want, but i cant have it working along the joomla native content. For that i will have to enable joomla router (Global Configuration > SEBLOD > Site > SEF (Canonical URLs) - Yes).

So the question is: is there any problem or conflict using the canonical field with the joomla router enabled?

Thanks in advance.

Hi,

I don't think Seblod disables joomla canonical on pages where Seblod is not present (e.g. on some other component), is this what you are experiencing?

Yes, this is what i am experiencing.

When i set seblod router as suggested in canonical field description (Global Configuration > SEBLOD > Site > SEF (Canonical URLs) - No), i lost the canonical tag on all pages, even in the components where Seblod is not present.

This is happening in my live site, and also in a test local server with another installation.